the-eagle-atarian

You read that title and thought it was satire, right?

Well boy are you in for a treat, here’s the latest feminist complaint:

>”Ever get the feeling that the general lack of pockets on your lady clothing is a conspiracy designed specifically to keep you from advancing by rendering you less effective? You were right. The jig is up. No pockets = sexism…”

>”This is a longstanding problem all women have endured for our entire lives. Women going pocketless is an under-addressed, silent epidemic that has infantilized us…”

Feminism

Not

Even

Once

weileash

There are no pockets because the pants are barely pants, they’re more like leggings, so having the bulk of pocket fabric creates lumps.  I struggle with this because

barely pockets because pants so tight and all lumpy

or

no pockets nice and smooth but where do I put my chapstick oh God– oh wait I have PURSE.